2012年9月11日星期二

Luxury goods companies feel the heat


  I have already written several times about the growing risks to keep luxury good company shares. A few goodies in the weekend papers advocating the sale without ever clearer.

First, a little story in the Guardian. He noted the case of Yang Dacai official state and its collection of watches - I tweeted about last week. Yang put online in pictures on several occasions, a variety of different ridiculously expensive watches, none of them, he should be able to pay his official salary. It is currently owned by the provincial Party Committee for Discipline Inspection (which does not sound good).

Yang problems are not accidental. It is also a return to the noise Ferrari accident in March, where it is rumored that the son of one of the allies of President Hu Jintao's death. Meet the leaders are now routinely taken out of bloggers evidence for this type of equipment designers could not afford a state salary to live alone.

The result? The government says the Guardian, "has ordered officials to avoid luxury cars and expensive banquets." So it is not just a good idea to keep your propensity for corruption and nepotism advertise through your watches, costumes and cars (see my blog, "Look at me, I'm a thief enemy of the people"), but the government told you to him to take a break. I do not see how these are good news for luxury goods companies in China for its growth.

And it is not only in China, where the likes of Ferrari, need to have their wits about them. The Sunday Times InGear section this week was a little piece of the super sports car and taxes. Regular readers will know that taxes on real estate performance vehicles in Italy has recently quadrupled - now it costs about £ 6,500 a year in taxes to own a Lamborghini. They could not know that the Liberal Democrats were ideas.

Their political leaders, in their strange pauses plan impossible taxes on capital are apparently "plans for a tax on expensive vehicles, which could add at least £ 8000 for a new Ferrari or Lamborghini." It makes sense to keep luxury goods on the basis that many people are getting richer and the rich to pay you more for luxury goods. None of these things are as true as they were.


没有评论:

发表评论